Wise sages throughout time have realized that most people say they want freedom, but when the people finally acquire the keys to freedom, they reject complete freedom.
Much of the problem with popular notions of freedom is that it is that we mistake license for freedom. A useful way to view the two concepts is to remember that license is a subset of freedom. License is the belief that we can do whatever we want, whenever we want to do it. Taken as a whole, freedom encompasses much more than license. To possess freedom requires that we take full accountability and responsibility for our speech and actions. License assumes no accountability while freedom implies the understanding that there are consequences for everything we say and do. The truth of the matter is that many people are frightened of accountability and responsibility.
“People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use.”–Søren Kierkegaard
We might interpret Kierkegaard’s statement as another way of people wishing to enjoy the license to speak but without the pain of accountability. Once achieved, freedom of speech is a vital component of any democratic republic or social group. This is a basic fact. On the other hand, freedom of thought is a trickier proposition. We are encouraged to think about certain concepts and topics in conventional ways. If we have unconventional thoughts, we are discouraged from communicating them to others even though we’re technically allowed to do so. This is a way of implying that freedom has limits. When one voices her unconventional thoughts there will be consequences for such communication whether or not she realizes this is so. There is a sharp learning curve if she had never before understood that freedom of speech has consequences. This is further complicated if she advocates in favor of limiting the freedom of others. Although she may have the philosophical and religious freedoms to advocate the abridgment of freedoms of others, her statements will trigger the ire of those who do not want their freedoms impinged. As a result, society encounters hot-button controversies such as “religious freedom”.
How do we address the ideal of ensuring freedom and liberty for all with the opinion that some people’s freedoms should be curtailed? The controversy itself invites the encroachment of influential, powerful people who accelerate the curtailment of everyone’s freedoms in general. The conundrum of guaranteeing the freedom to advocate the abridgment of freedom versus assuring everyone of their freedom has not yet been resolved. Satisfying one party will, so far, only cause the other party to be unsatisfied. Resolution may finally occur when all parties realize that freedom applies to all people, even those people we do not like.
“I’ve sold my soul for freedom. It’s lonely but it’s sweet.”–Melissa Etheridge
Officially expressed freedom is only one aspect of total freedom. To be a fully realized person to exercise full freedom involves consciousness, a good conscience, a creative mind, and independent will. Acquiring and keeping freedom requires the power to change, the power to choose, and the power to respond. Without these powers, promises of freedom are hollow. As is the case with freedom, the use of these powers comes with consequences.
Whatever it is that you feel in your heart, requires a free and open mind. To go after your dreams and heart’s desire involves the freedom of expression. That is the manifestation of freedom.
CiaoThe Blue Jay of Happiness quotes Bob Dylan. “A hero is someone who understands the responsibility that comes with his freedom.”
-
Recent Posts
Flying to past posts
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
Bird’s Eye Views
You’re quoting Bob Dylan. Yes, for my generation of late hippies the word had and still has a central meaning. Above all, it was freedom in the world of the outdated views of our parents’ generation. Others, like Chris Christoferson, have defined it differently: “Freedom’s just another word for nothing have to loose”.
Indeed, desperation can motivate the desire for freedom from oppression. Most of the freedom and liberation movements came about after people have had enough hardship. This is true on the individual scale, too.
Your article is very good and important hits the nail on the head. Kirkegaard is unfortunately not known to as many as he deserves it.
Naturally, the topic has a particularly important meaning for me when I paint abstractly. For me a sentence in Chinese art theory offers me a very good aspect: “Laws make you free”. What sounds paradoxical at first is no longer when we look at our training in, for example, piano playing. Scales up and down, etudes and only when we have mastered these is the piano concerto on the program at some point.
Freedom of speech can only make sense if we have a sound basis on which to grow our thoughts. Otherwise it’s babbling or irrelevance or worse.
Laws can be thought of as parameters on the grand scale. Without grammatical rules, our language would be incomprehensible to others.
Love the Kierkegaard quote. Also reminds me of Jack frequently pointing out, when he saw someone acting or sounding stupid in a blatant way, that the person was saying “I’m stupid and I don’t know it, but I want you to know it.”
Ha, that’s some serious shade. 🙂
💜 This a Dangerous Use of Semantics with The Best of Intention EveryOne; it’s how Dictators Rise and Fall
…💛💚💙…
this is a great assessment of the current “cancel culture debate” taking place on mass media shows… it’s not “canceling” someone if it’s simply holding them accountable for their views.
Reblogged this on Ned Hamson's Second Line View of the News.
The cancel culture brouhaha is so tiresome. Ethical, responsible speech and actions should be the norm.